The DNC and Hollywood continues to attack Trump with even much more intensity then they did during the era of Watergate and Nixon.
Notice how this has some of the same feel to it. The elite left-wing are dreaming about the ‘good old days’ and they are releasing a film glorifying The Washington Post the organ of propaganda that took Nixon down. The Washington Post is not just some ‘newspaper’. It is the CIA itself and an extension of the Deep State.
If you’re looking for James Bond or your cousin the Navy Seal forget it. The power of the press can crush anyone.
The news is the Deep State and it is out to crush Trump.
Due to the development of sophisticated technology they can get on cable news networks and social media and attack the president 24/7.
He can tweet right back at them that it’s all “Fake News”.
I am not saying that Trump is going to “win” in his battle against the “New World Order”, but then again, who knows?
What is apparent however is that there is a fight going on. Some in the ‘truth’ movement say ‘Trump is safe’ because he has ‘sold out’ to the Jews.
BS. If he were ‘safe’, the JMSM would cease and desist in its seek and destroy mission against him.
But if you think President Trump has not done anything to fight the ‘Deep State’ and organized Jewish power, then re-read this one I wrote.
Yet again the ‘Truth Movement’ fails on Trump’s Secret War with Israel. Recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel will force a ‘deal’.
To say he is a puppet of the Zionists or that his son in law runs the entire White House is a lie.
Trump needed the help of Jared aka ‘Kush’ and the powerful Mercer family to win the election anyway. Yes, that’s the way politics works.
Who knows it may turn out to be a good thing Trump has split from Bannon. Those of us who read between the lines know Breitbart News, Drudge, etc are interesting but essentially pro-Israel. Robert Mercer himself remains a mystery. More on him latter. Nevertheless Trump needed these people to win the election period. They know Data. They knew how to use sophisticated technology to win. the Mercer controlled corp Cambridge Analytica (CA) was the only one that polled Trump to win and he did win. It was all shady but not compared to killing Seth Rich and perhaps even Victor Thorn and others.
So in some ways a split with Bannon might be good, might be bad, too early to say. Trump likes to fire people anyway.
If the Russia probe goes near Trump’s finances, ‘he’s sunk,’ so says ‘Fire and Fury’ author Michael Wolf (a disgusting fake news/deep state liar) and who may be right about this, because the Russia probe is not going away and the liberal elites and Jews are not going to stop saying Trump is crazy.
Many women of America don’t care about war with Russia. The only issue that swirls around in their tiny little skulls is that they want Trump dead. Identity politics rules the day.
Whoever is able to support Trump should. This includes American Jews who should do their best to avoid some kind of violence that may erupt if Trump is thrown out of office in this illegal coup.
The stars of the Alt-Right or ‘truth’ movement who have had the guts to speak out against crimes of the State of Israel have folded on Trump. This continues to baffle me.
Trump is not crazy and Russia wanted Trump to win. Is that against the law? Israel and Saudi Arabia wanted Clinton and did everything outside the aw possible to help her and yet there are no ‘probes’ going on in that regard.
Some of us simply don’t seem to understand that at this moment if the enemies of Trump break him the rule of law of the land will be broken. The US will go back to where it was with Obama, along with a truly aggressive posture towards China and Russia. The Donald was and is bluffing on North Korea.
Can you not see the names and faces of the media people and politicians who are after Trump? And no, it is not just a ‘left wing’ or ‘Democrat’ thing. The very same Neo-cons who controlled the Bush WH for 8 years and who are dead set on war with Iran are TO A MAN opposed to Trump ad want him gone. If Trump is–as claimed by various ‘experts’ these days–owned completely by Jewish interests or “illuminati” power then why the drive to declare him insane under article 25? Saying they are ‘behind’ Trump and controlling his every move is the equivalent of some of the inanity post-9/11 such as ‘hologram planes’ hitting the WTC.
WHY DO THAT TO YOUR AGENT IN PLACE?
They the Jews already worked with Trump in New York and already did not like him. It’s is true they installed him as a front man for Resorts International, and yes, his son in law is a Jew and Ivanka is a liberal. Some of Trump’s friends are Jewish. That is New York City life and business. That does not mean they ‘like’ Trump. Furthermore they know what he can do. It was Trump who was the real prime mover behind ‘fixing’ Manhattan, not Rudy Giuliani and even Chief of Police Bratton. No Trump fixed NYC. Did he kick the poor and the drug addicts out of Manhattan island and gentrify it? You bet your life. That was mean but it worked and he did it. Is he flashing some Masonic hand sign? More than likely. So did Nixion. Look at what they did to Nixon. He is portrayed as a nasty American Hitler. And by the way, under Nixon the US got out of Nam.
Recall that JFK was put in power by Jewish power. Once in the seat of power it was a different game as he and his brother RFK worked hard to thwart the corruption
My point is in this case the lesser of two evils is a lot better. We’re not going to get a Ron Paul for president. We’re not going to get a peace activist president. So instead of saying Trump is under control I recommend full support of Trump and take care when being critical of Trump so it does not add to the power of the forces that are out to remove him
A “good deal” for America of the Jerusalem gambit. Is better than a 100% pro-Israel deal.
We don’t know where Trump truly stands on Iran. I think he prefers to stay out of any real conflict with Iran. It’s bad for business. Oil companies for instance don’t want a fight with Iran. (However, Trump may have caved to the Deep Ste on Iran. Bad but this doesn’t matter because Iran can withstand a Deep State coup). We know the Deep State and Israel want Iran destroyed. We don’t know if the “agency’ attempted a coup or whether it was Saudi Arabia or merely an internal matter for power consolidation. It is difficult to say if it went well for the Trump team. Afghanistan Trump should pull the troops out. But can he. The “Deep State” wants the opium poppies protected by the US military. Hence there is not much he can do.
One thing is for certain many Trump supporters are very pro-Israel. That would like to be the only ones aboard the Trump train. Driving the train? You bet.
What caused the FBI to open a counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign in July 2016, which evolved into the criminal investigation that is said today to imperil the Trump presidency?
As James Comey’s FBI and Special Counsel Robert Mueller have, for 18 months, failed to prove Donald Trump’s “collusion” with the Kremlin, what was it, in mid-2016, that justified starting this investigation?
What was the basis for the belief Trump was colluding, that he was the Manchurian candidate of Vladimir Putin? What evidence did the FBI cite to get FISA court warrants to surveil and wiretap Trump’s team?
Republican congressmen have for months been demanding answers to these questions. And, as Mueller’s men have stonewalled, suspicions have arisen that this investigation was, from the outset, a politicized operation to take down Trump.
Feeding those suspicions has been the proven anti-Trump bias of investigators. Also, wiretap warrants of Trump’s team are said to have been issued on the basis of a “dirty dossier” that was floating around town in 2016 — but which mainstream media refused to publish as they could not validate its lurid allegations.
Who produced the dossier?
Ex-British spy Christopher Steele, whose dirt was delivered by ex-Kremlin agents. And Steele was himself a hireling of Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit enlisted and paid by the Clinton campaign and DNC.
Writes the Washington Times, Steele “paid Kremlin sources with Democratic cash.”
Yet, if Steele’s dossier is a farrago of falsehoods and fake news, and the dossier’s contents were used to justify warrants for wiretaps on Trump associates, Mueller has a problem.
Prosecutions his team brings could be contaminated by what the FBI did, leaving his investigation discredited.
Fortunately, all this was cleared up for us New Year’s Eve by a major revelation in The New York Times. Top headline on page one:
“Unlikely Source Propelled Russia Meddling Inquiry”
The story that followed correctly framed the crucial question:
“What so alarmed American officials to provoke the FBI to open a counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign months before the presidential election?”
The Times then gave us the answer we have been looking for:
“It was not, as Trump and other politicians have alleged, a dossier compiled by a former British spy hired by a rival campaign. Instead it was firsthand information from one of America’s closest intelligence allies.”
The ally: Australia, whose ambassador to Britain was in an “upscale London Bar” in the West End in May 2016, drinking with a sloshed George Papadopoulos, who had ties to the Trump campaign and who informed the diplomat that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton.
Papadopoulos had reportedly been told in April that Russia had access to Clinton’s emails.
Thus, when the DNC and John Podesta emails were splashed all over the U.S. press in June, Amb. Alexander Downer, recalling his conversation with Papadopoulos, informed his government, which has excellent ties to U.S. intelligence, and the FBI took it from there.
The Times’ story pounds home this version of events:
“The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the FBI to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russian attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of Trump’s associates conspired.”
This, the Times assures us, “answers one of the lingering mysteries of the past year.”
But if Papadopoulos’s drunken babbling to the Aussie ambassador triggered the investigation in July 2016, why was George not interviewed by the FBI until January 2017?
According to the Times, an FBI agent in Rome had been told by Steele in June 2016 what he had learned from the Russians.
And Steele was interviewed by the FBI in October 2016.
If Papadopoulos triggered the investigation, why the seeming FBI disinterest in him — as compared to Steele?
Yet another major question remains unanswered.
If, as the Times writes, the FBI was looking “into Russian attempts to disrupt the elections,” why did the FBI not open an investigation into the KGB roots of the Steele dossier that was written to destroy the Republican candidate, Donald Trump?
If Trump’s alleged “collusion” with Putin to damage Clinton was worthy of an all-out FBI investigation, why did the Clinton-DNC scheme to tie Trump to Russian prostitutes, using British spies and former KGB agents, not merit an FBI investigation?
Why was there less concern about the Clinton campaign’s ties to Russian agents, than to Trumpian “collusion” that is yet unproven?
Consider what the British spy Steele and his former KGB/FSB comrades accomplished:
They have kept alive a special counsel’s investigation that has divided our country, imperiled the FBI’s reputation, preoccupied and damaged a president, and partially paralyzed the U.S. government.
Putin must be marveling at the astonishing success of his old comrades from KGB days, who could pull off an intelligence coup like this and so cripple the superpower that won the Cold War.